to begin a conversation in that fashion is not considerate on your part.
yet i will respond to that statement.
i am old school.
as c5q79 of the quatrains of nostradamus states.
i admit it.
the ancient ones, IN HEAVEN,, whom i know, and you do not know, would
say that my grammar is perfect and the grammar of todays age is
thoroughly lacking in common sense.
regarding this totally stupid era of humans, who destroy earth willingly like goofs.
anyways, regarding logical grammar this age of humans is goofy beyond rational.
deliberate fools do not acknowledge this obvious truth, though.
for example, why is it that todays english states the following.
the word 'inconsiderate'' means that 'someone is not being considerate.
for example, you are not being considerate in how you have begun this conversation with me..
yet, anyways, regarding appropriate grammar, obviously 'logic dictates
that the definition to the word '''inconsiderate'''should be as follows.
''MARKED BY THE NEEDS OR FEELINGS OF OTHERS.
AND NOT THE OPPOSITE OF THAT DEFINITION.
SO, THE POINT IS AS FOLLOWS.
WHY DO HUMANS TODAY SAY THAT THE WORD 'INCONSIDERATE'''
MEANS THAT YOU ARE NOT BEING 'CONSIDERATE.''
IT SHOULD SAY 'UN--CONSIDERATE.''
NOT IN---CONSIDERATE.
obviously it should say ' unconsiderate.
and not 'inconsiderate.
''un'' means 'no.
in means 'yes. technically speaking.
TODAYS HUMAN LANQUAGES ARE FILLED WITH FLAWS.
i explain this actually in detail in my website.
MY GRAMMAR IS PERFECT.
people who never hearken to wisdom NEVER SEE THAT, THOUGH.
yet i am divine wisdom.
as everything in my website proves.
you think the inhabitants of heaven talk like people today?
your sadly mistaken if you think that.
heaven knows i am right in all i say.
heaven would not dare rebuke me in any way. as c3q94 of the prophesies of michel denotredame state.
regarding who i am in this life.
the only
direct male lineal offspring of the goddess sophia and jesus christ in the second most ancient of all existences.
which is a subject explained upon my website.
so, on that note addressed i will say only this.
if i was not portraying a slight submissive on this site to you i would say something here.
it is only because i have chosen to play the submissive with you that i refrain myself from saying something very rational here.
regarding totally logical functions which relate to simple proper linquistics.
yet simply note this.
in my website i prove 'with perfect facts, that everything i am saying to you 'here, is truth.
so?
what is a fact?
what does a human dictionary state the meaning to the word 'fact' is?
think about that.
obviously that means i am right and you are wrong regarding proper linquistics.
perhaps you should read my website.
then, if you wish, get back to me on my first letter addressed to you.
YES. read
http://ouranus.blogspot.com
respectfully.
shakinnotstirred
written about 3 hours ago:
susan, i am pasting a letter i wrote to another foolish girl here. for you.
so you may analyse the facts of what i am saying- appropriately.
i'd think, before you talk, susan.
listen to wisdom.
here is the pasted note:
below.
-------to get straight to the point of this letter
i now say this 'respectfully to you..
do you ladies suspect that i am not who humans think i am in this life?
your right if you suspect that, that statement is correct..
now, on that note addressed i wish to declare the following to you now. which is simply this.
please note that i say this `respectfully to you.
please note that, technically, on a foolish level, on my part, in this life,
i entreated you ladies respectfully, on a matter of servitude, because of my feminine attachment to a deity named salmacus.
in this life.
this is due unto the fact that, technically, on many foolish levels, for
the moment, i am still one with the nature of a deity named salmacus in
this life.
which most humans are too stupid to understand. as c2q45 of the quatrains of nostradamus state.
'''androgynous'' means just that.
see this video.-
http://youtu.be/m3K5Nbkplqk
to appropriately comphrehend this statement addressed.
if you see this video you will understand what is addressed below in
connection to a journal attached to my website entitled 'a shot in the
dark.
so, unfortunately, presently, i am partially 'one' with salmacus.
which means, unfotunately, that, for the present, at least i am subject 'partially to her submissive nature.
as c2q45 of the prophesies of nostradamus invoke.
yet, that will not be the case when this existence is through.
as c2 quatrains 28-29 of the vaticinal statements of nostradamus invoke.
anyhow,
the only thing this video 'addressed above'' gets wrong is that
'salmacus' is not the only guilty party on this matter addressed. any
nympho maniac female deity who lived as a nymph, or nymphomaniac was
just as guilty in the existence referred to, regarding salmacus and
hermaphroditus..
as the name signifies. a nymph of any kind is a nyhphomaniac.
clear and simple.
so?
obviously,
in the existence 'referred to' hermaphroditus suffered this plague of sexually demented women everywhere he went,.
it was not only salmacus.
yet, the point is that, salmacus is the deity nymphomaniac who got to hermaphroditus in such an existence.
with her idiotic prayers to demented jealous deities opposed to christ in such an existence.
an existence prior to the one we dwell in presently in fact.
okay?
okay.
so obviously, if all the facts of this life are taken into account
'appropriately' then the following statements which i address to you are
accurate.
in this letter.
in connection to c10q75 of the quatrains of nostradamus.
as c2q45 states.
regarding a deity descended from the good christian devoted deity-named- hermes.
i am that being.
okay.
in prior existences i was made a hermaphrodite by jealous deceptive deities rebellious to christ.
so be it. whatever.
that is what nostradamus refers to, in c2q45 of his quatrains to humanity in this life.
so.
what does c2q45 refer ultimately to??
it refers to an androgynous being in connection to john 4: 24.
androgynous 'literally speaking' means what it says, in a spiritual light..
.so?
once again, to you ladies i ask this query?
think now?
think.
what does androgynous mean?
obviously it means what it says.
regarding this matter addressed.
see once again c2q45 of the quatrains of nostradamus.
decipher simple vaticinal logic.
very simple indeed.
do not ignore sensible simple logic.
now that does not mean that 'in this life, i am a hermaphrodite, physically speaking, in particular.
. Christ altered that spell, somewhat in this life, to make me 'male' again.
in a certain prior existence, unknown to evil spirits in existence on many wave lengths.
at least, according to the facts of this existence that statement istruth. so, what is a fact?
what does a fact warrant?
according to a dictionary a fact equals truth.\
so, keeping that statement in mind, ladies , what do the facts of this situation state?
obviously, according to all the facts addressed which relate to this life , everything i say makes sense.
as my website entitled
http://ouranus.blogspot.com proves.
a fact warrants truth.
i am the fulfillment of c2q45 of the quatrains of nostradamus.
if facts in this life matter that is who i am.
it is, either, that statement is truth , or the creator or creators of
this existence, male or female- are totally callous and sinful for going
to ridiculously sinful extents to lie about facts in this life. so?
i wonder which option is correct?
is it 'option A, the true CREATOR OR CREATORS OF THIS LIFE ARE
IDIOTICALLY SINFUL IN APPROPRIATE FACTS IN THIS LIFE, OR IS IT OPTION
'B' WHAT I SAY IS TRUTH AND THE CREATOR OR CREATORS OF ALL LIFE ARE
SACRED IN TRUTH.
BY WAY OF THE FACTS ADDRESSED IN THIS EXISTENCE, IT IS CLEARLY EITHER ONE OR THE OTHER.
FACTUALLY SPEAKING MY WEBSITE AS WELL AS MY WORDS PROVE THAT STATEMENT BEYOND ANY SHADOW OF A DOUBT.
EITHER I AM WHO I SAY I AM IN THIS LIFE OR THE TRUE CREATOR OR CREATORS
OF ALL LIFE ARE CLEARLY RIDICULOUSLY SINFUL REGARDING APPROPRIATE TRUTH.
IN ANY EXTENT IN TRUTH OR LOGIC.
THAT STATEMENT IS THOROUGHLY OBVIOUS.
SO.
FOR NOW, IN THIS LETTER, LET US JUST SAY THAT 'THE CREATOR OR CREATORS
OF THIS LIFE ARE RIGHTEOUS AND I AM WHO I SAY I AM IN THIS LIFE. A BEING
NAMED HERMAPRODITUS.
a shadow of my former self, according to the facts. WITH 'STILL' VARIOUS
ELEMENTS OF A BEING NAMED SALMACUS UPON ME REGARDING THE FACTS OF ALL
PRIOR CREATED EXISTENCES,.
WHICH GIVES ME A SLIGHT FEMININE NATURE IN THIS LIFE.
yet 'male, mostly, nonetheless.
IN THIS EXISTENCE. O MY.
SO?
when this life is through 'THOUGH' i will return to my former honorable self.
against the IDIOTIC wishes of corrupt callous jealous deities opposed to the true son of God- jesus christ .
yet the nymph,' salmacus' is still spiritually as well as partially molecularly, a part of me. inside.
so,
, for the sake of record, my unfortunate spiritual as well as 'partial
physical attachment to such a goddess in this life warrants the truth of
that statement addressed.
i explain this statement upon my website. with accurately addressed facts.
obviously. yes 'that truth,
so, the point to this letter i address to you ladies is as follows.
if facts in this life matter, then i 'irrefutably am' who i say 'i am.
so, on that note addressed i will say this.
presently i am partially consigned to the will and nature of salmacus.
though i rank higher then all beings in existence 'save for four.
my mother 'sophia, my father, jesus christ, and my GRANDMOTHER AND GRANDFATHER.
THE CHRISTIAN GOD AND HOLY GHOST.
UNDER THOSE CIRCUMSTANCES ADDRESSED ONLY A FOOLISH LADY WOULD REFUSE MY OFFER OF SERVITUDE TO HER.
PERCEIVE THAT TRUTH LADIES.
https://www.box.com/s/1e087c582fcbc45bb2f2
http://youtu.be/Q-SACWs5eVE
WHO AM I?
C5Q79 OF THE QUATRAINS OF NOSTRADAMUS.
BORN ORIGINALLY OF JESUS CHRIST AND SOPHIA, THE ONLY DIRECT REAL SISTER OF JESUS.
ONLY DAUGHTER OF THE CHRISTIAN GOD AND HOLY GHOST.
I AM HER ONLY DIRECT SON.
THROUGH JESUS.
IN THE THIRD MOST ANCIENT PRIOR EXISTENCE.
AS C5Q79 OF THE WORDS OF NOSTRADAMUS SAY CONCERNING ME LIKEWISE,.
IN A MORE RECENT PRIOR EXISTENCE, GOD TOOK ME, AND MADE ME INTO A CHILD
OF HERMES AND APHRODITE. AS C10Q75 STATES. YET, ORIGINALLY SPEAKING, I
AM THE DRIECT CHILD OF JESUS CHRIST AND SOPHIA.
BORN IN A SPIRITUAL MANNER WHICH HUMANS DO NOT COMPHREHEND.
THOUGH I AM HUMAN IN THIS LIFE.
ALL FACTS VERIFY THAT 'ONLY A FOOLISH BEING' WOULD REFUSE MY OFFER OF SERVITUDE UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES ADDRESSED.
DO YOU KNOW HOW POWERFUL A DESCENDANT OF MINE , IN THIS SPECIFIC EXISTENCE WOULD BE, SPIRITUALLY SPEAKING?
ONLY I COULD STOP SUCH A BEING, SPIRITUALLY.
CONSIDER THOSE STATEMENTS ADDRESSED, LADIES.
FOR THE SAKE OF THE FOOLISH NATURE OF A BEING NAMED SALMACUS, I STILL AM PARTIALLY SUBJECT TO HER NATURE IN THIS LIFE, THOUGH.
FORTUNATE FOR YOU.
YET,,
REGARDING MY OFFER OF SERVITUDE, TO YOU LADIES
MY OFFER WILL NOT LAST MUCH LONGER.
regarding salmacus's needs in this life.
i am one with her, for now.
which means i offer my servitude to you in this life.
DO NOT STARE A GIFT HORSE IN THE MOUTH, TOO LONG.
LEST THAT GIFT DISSAPPEAR..
toodle loo for now,
SO THATS THE PASTED LETTER-SUSAN.
IT EXPLAINS VALID PRINCIPLES OF WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT IN MY NOTES TO HUMANITY IN THIS LIFE.
you would be wise to think and analyse all the facts of this existence,
before you foolishly slander what pertains to facts. or 2nd peter 1,
susan
.
No comments:
Post a Comment